Pushing children to achieve robs them of their childhood.

Some people claim that it is necessary to make children achieve from an early age, while others argue that such activity steals childhood from them. In this essay, I will try to look upon this issue.

From my point of view, forcing children to succeed is a kind of violence. Firstly, pressure leaves children no time to play, which leads to some emotional problems. Secondly, working hard, always having busy schedule, having no time for fun- these are not children’s matters. The last but not the least is that constant pressure leads children being under a great deal of stress. That is why I vote against striving for constant achievement.

However, some people believe that making children to succeed from a young age is very beneficial. They support their opinion by the fact that it is easier to develop skills in early childhood. Besides, a bit of pressure will prepare children for success in life. These arguments make people think that forcing youngsters is a positive thing.

Nevertheless, I do not agree with these arguments, because they are not convincing for me. This is exactly owing to my belief that race rush takes away all the things that are fun about being a child.

In conclusion, I strongly believe that parental pressure is not beneficial for children. It is essential to let the child be the child.

The standard 4-5 weeks’ holiday that employees receive is insufficient for dealing with stress.

Nowadays it is quite hard to balance work with rest: for some people 4-5 holiday is enough to recover from work, while others argue that such amount of time is insufficient for dealing with stress. That is why the problem of how long the vacation should last becomes a topic of great deal of discussions.

From my point of view 4-5 weeks is an excellent length of vacation for reducing stress. Firstly, some employees in countries with very high standard of living like China or Australia cannot afford such a long vacation. However, people in these countries live happily and have time for relaxation. Secondly, it is feasible to have a rest in full for such a long period: to spend time with friends or family or even to have a flight to a resort. The last but not the least is that if the main goal of prolonging the duration of holidays is an attempt to avoid stress, then it is pointless, because stress is an inevitable part of life. That is why I believe that a 4-5 weeks’ holiday is sufficient.

Although, some people claim that it is impossible to rest in such short time. They support their opinion by the fact that 4-5 weeks are not enough for full relaxation after an existing work period. Besides, it is hard to get into a normal routine without previous decent rest. These arguments make people think of holiday’s shortage.

Nevertheless, I do not agree with these arguments. This is exactly owing to my belief that it is much harder to get into the rut after too long-lasting vacation.

In conclusion, I would like to state that 4-5 weeks’ leave is enough for relaxation. That is why I vote for it.

Graffiti is an art form that should be respected and admired.

Some people claim that graffiti is vandalism, while others argue that graffiti is a special art form that should be admired. In this essay, I will try to look upon this issue.

From my point of view, graffiti should not be respected, because it cannot be considered as art. Firstly, obscene words and senseless pictures are disgusting and disrespectful. Secondly, graffiti usually spoil monuments, memorial walls, tombstones, metro carriages… And the last but not the least is that graffiti is not agreed with the city government or with building owners, that is the cause why graffiti artists are punished by law.

That is why I believe that graffiti is more vandalism than art and I cannot admit it.

However, some people believe that such “artworks” should be seen with fascination. They support their opinion by the fact that graffiti is the great way of self-expression that conveys the important massage or explains something to the people. Besides, graffiti can make deserted houses and fences look more vivid. These arguments make people think that graffiti is a modern art form.

Nevertheless, I do not agree with these arguments because they are not convincing for me. This is exactly owing to my belief that graffiti is just not the right way of self-realization that results in spoiled surrounding infrastructure.

In conclusion, I would like to state that graffiti is more like vandal action deed than a piece of art and it should not be promoted or admired. Therefore, I vote against it.

Filmgoers should rely on reviews when choosing a film to see.

Some people claim that it is necessary to look through reviews before choosing a film to see, while others argue that a short overview of film-description will be enough or not necessary at all. In this essay, I will try to look upon this issue.

From my point of view, it is better for filmgoers to browse some reviews primarily. Firstly, people, who leave feedbacks about different films, usually give very useful recommendations with reasoning if to see particular film or not. This provides full understanding of how interesting or boring the movie may be. Secondly, reviews usually help to choose the right film to watch relying on individual preferences. And the last but not the least is that paying attention to the feedbacks may prevent film-lovers from wasting their time on worthless film-session. That is why I vote for giving due consideration to the feedbacks.

However, some people believe that it is useless to read reviews. They support their opinion by the fact that it is meaningless to rely on perspectives of others. It is essential for them to form a view on their own. Besides, there are plenty of spoilers in the reviews. These arguments make people think about the disadvantages of reading feedbacks.

Nevertheless, I do not agree with these arguments. This is exactly owing to my belief that it is better to trust people who are writing reviews than to waste hours on boring or pointless movie.

In conclusion, I would like to state that filmgoers should rely on reviews because it is very beneficial. Therefore, I always look through it before choosing a film as a matter of course.

Governments should limit the size of sugary drink containers in order to improve public health.

Sugary drinks are very common nowadays, and indeed, they have sweet flavor and do not cost much. Most people like soft juices and consume them regularly, though those, who do not, believe that such kind of drinks is very harmful and wish the government to limit the size of sugary beverage containers.

From my point of view, the reduction in the size of the packaging is not helpful. First and foremost, in order to improve public health it is essential to raise awareness among people about the health hazard soft drinks may cause. Secondly, the government has to promote the idea of healthy lifestyle and proper nutrition with the help of mass media and social advertising. This will be more efficient than the limitation in the size of sweet beverage as well. Moreover, the government could increase prices for sugary drinks and, therefore, influence lowering soft juices consumption.

However, some people believe that it is necessary to decrease the size of sugary drink containers. They support their opinion by the fact that the smaller the packaging is, the less sugar the beverage contains. Besides, the limited capacity of containers will remind consumers of the harm the juice may cause. These arguments make people think about the quantity of sugar they consume.

Nevertheless, I do not agree with these arguments because they are not convincing for me. This is exactly owing to my belief that people do not realize how much sugar even the small packaging of a drink contains. Thus, a person had better think before making a decision to by any kind of those attractive containers.

Taking everything into account, one must admit that in order to improve public health governments have to take much more serious steps in this sphere. At the same time, it would be useful for people to reconsider their position concerning the consumption of such drinks either.

People shouldn`t be allowed to work from home because it`s less productive than being in the office.

Nowadays everyone can choose a working place relying on personal preferences. Some people vote for working at home, though, some of them believe that people should not be only allowed to work from an office due to better productivity.

From my point of view, it is important to allow working at home, because it is much more beneficial. Firstly, people feel more comfortable and relaxed when they work in a non-stressful environment. Calm conditions will help employees to focus on the work in a significant way. Secondly, home-based work will allow employees to spare more time to other important aspects of life such as their family, health and friends. Moreover, workers do not have to spend their time on transport if they do business at home. This may even increase one`s working capacity. That is why I vote for having the workplace at home.

However, some people believe that working in the office is more effective. They support their opinion by the fact that it is harder for an employee to concentrate thoughts in the appropriate way and start doing business at home, where he does not have tight rein and control. Besides, collective work and brainstorms, which improve productivity, may only be offered in the office. These arguments make people think about the advantages of working outside their homes.

Nevertheless, I do not agree with these arguments because they are not convincing for me. This is exactly owing to my belief that even without constant supervision of the boss and the help of brainstorming sessions people can be really very productive. They will be able to do their work properly, and this is not always due to their willpower, but thanks to the job they love.

In conclusion, I would like to state that home-based workplace may lead the employees to perfect efficiency. Therefore, I would like to work from home in the future.

People have become too dependent on technolohies.

Different kinds of technologies are widely disseminated and easily acceptable nowadays. Practically each of us uses technologies everyday. Most people cannot even imagine their life without gadgets. That is why the problem of people`s dependency on technologies has become a topic of great deal of discussions.

From my point of view, technologies have become so much a part of our lives that we cannot exist without them. Indeed, people depend on their devices very much. This is due to the fact that today`s world requires using technologies on a daily basis, because of modern life`s  rhythm. Secondly, most people are just used to them, so it is very hard to give up all the benefits of progress.

However, some people believe that overall dependence on technologies is not right. They support their opinion by the fact that Africa and Latin America live without technologies and gadgets. Moreover, people do many important things without many machines or devices, they do not even think about them all the time, though, they still use a great number of gadgets.

Nevertheless, I do not agree with these arguments because they are not convincing for me. This is exactly owing to my belief that in the first case the population of Africa and Latin America do not have access to modern technologies. As of the second point, we must state the fact that maybe people do not think about their, home appliances, still they cannot imagine their life without them.

In conclusion, I would like to summarize that nowadays people are dependent on modern technologies. They became not only very convenient, but also very necessary. Actually, I find it very useful that in most countries we can work with our devices whenever we wish.

Team sports help people develop a stronger character than individual sports do.

Most people love sports, and consequently, they try to spare some time for it, at least, three days a week. Everyone has his own preferences: some people are favored over team sports and some choose individual sports to do. People from both of opposing groups consider that their way of doing sports helps to develop a stronger character.

From my point of view, individual sports have greater impact on people`s characters. Firstly they teach to be steady in one`s purposes. Secondly, they cease to rely on others, because everything is entirely up to them. Moreover, only personal commitment and aspiration develop stronger character. And this is exactly what the individual kinds of sport do.

However, there are plenty of benefits from team sports. That is why so many people vote for team kinds of sport as a means of character development. They support their opinion by the fact that a team encourages the players to cooperate with each other, which is a useful skill in everyday life. Besides, members learn the ways of supporting and dealing with disappointment in case of failure. Thus, many people consider team sports as a way to master stronger character.

Nevertheless, I do not agree with these arguments because they are not convincing for me. This is exactly owing to my belief that the strong character is not always a result of cooperation and support in a team. It is a result of serious inner work.

In conclusion, I would like to state that team sports have less influence on person`s character in comparison with individual sports. Therefore, I usually prefer doing sports by myself.

A live music performance is always inferior to a studio recording.

People love music, the youth cannot even live without their favorite music. Sometimes it is better to enjoy a live music performance, though in some cases people prefer studio recordings dew to a good quality. Live concerts may have worse sound.

From my point of view, a studio recording is better than a live music show. The first argument in favor of studio recordings is the absence of the noise of the crowd. The second one is that studio equipment creates the best sound quality. One more very important reason is the work of the sound director, which results in the music that we love listening.

However, there are many music lovers prefer live performances for a couple of reasons. Firstly, true fans of the singers would like to hear actual voices. Besides, they need to share their excitement with the crowd around them. That is why they visit live concerts.

Nevertheless, I do not agree whith these arguments, because they are not convincing for me. This is exactly owing to the crowd noise that I would rather listen to recordings.

In conclusion I would like to agree that live performances sound inferior in comparison with a studio recordings. Therefore, I usually prefer listening to albums of my favorite singers than to visit their conserts.